.png)
The USTR said 60 economies failed to prohibit, or enforce restrictions on, goods produced using forced labour. of these 17 will face 10% tariff and the remaining 43 economies will be subject to 12.5% tariff.


Ajay Srivastava, founder of Global Trade Research Initiative, is an ex-Indian Trade Service officer with expertise in WTO and FTA negotiations.
July 24, 2026 at 5:59 AM IST
The United States has reduced the proposed Section 301 forced-labour tariff on Indian exports to 10% from 12.5%, taking note of India's decision to ban imports of goods made with forced labour.
India has also not received the textile and apparel tariff-rate quota (TRQ) exemption under the new US Section 301 forced-labour tariff. The exemption applies to specified volumes of textile and apparel exports from Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, and Malaysia that use US-origin cotton and fiber. These qualifying exports are exempt from the new Section 301 duties.
The new tariffs also exempt goods covered by US free trade agreements such as USMCA and certain CAFTA-DR products.
For the European Union, Japan, Korea, Taiwan and Switzerland, the Section 301 duty is applied on a net-of-MFN basis, ensuring the combined tariff reaches the prescribed level rather than stacking the full Section 301 duty on top of existing MFN tariffs. For example, if an EU product already pays a 3% standard MFN duty, the Section 301 tariff tops it up by 7% so that the combined duty ceiling reaches 10%—rather than stacking a full 10% on top of the existing rate.
Categories of US tariffs on Indian exports
The 10% US tariff on Indian exports under the forced-labour investigation lacks a credible factual basis. The United States has not produced evidence that India imports goods made with forced labour. In response to US concerns, India has already amended its Foreign Trade Policy to ban the import of goods produced using forced or compulsory labour. Indian law also prohibits forced labour in domestic production through constitutional guarantees and labour statutes. The tariff therefore appears to serve primarily as a mechanism to preserve the Trump administration's tariff wall after the expiry of the temporary Section 122 tariffs, rather than as a targeted response to a proven forced-labour problem involving India.
The Trump administration is expected to announce the results of another Section 301 investigation into excess manufacturing capacity, which could lead to additional tariffs on a wide range of industrial products. Washington has also increasingly imposed country-specific tariffs, recently targeting Brazil and Canada. Similar measures could eventually be extended to India citing purchases of Russian oil, or broader geopolitical considerations.
|
US Tariff Snapshot: Indian Exports Over the Past Year |
|||
|
Period |
Section 232 Products Steel, aluminium, copper products, automobiles, auto components |
Most Manufactured Goods Engineering goods, textiles, chemicals, machinery, plastics, leather, gems & jewellery, furniture, etc. |
Exempt Products |
|
Aug. 27, 2025 – Feb. 23, 2026- Reciprocal Tariff Regime |
MFN + Section 232 tariff (25% or 50%) |
MFN + 50% tariff (25% reciprocal + 25% Russian oil surcharge) |
MFN only |
|
Feb. 24 – Jul. 24, 2026- Section 122 Tariff Regime |
MFN + Section 232 tariff (25% or 50%) |
MFN + 10% Section 122 tariff |
MFN only |
|
From Jul. 24, 2026- Forced labour tariffs replace Section 122 tariffs |
MFN + Section 232 tariff (25% or 50%) (No change) |
MFN+10% tariffs due to Forced labour |
MFN only |
|
C-GTRI |
|||