Monetary Policy's New Catch-22

With consumer inflation appearing repressed despite mounting price pressures, the RBI's decision to prioritise capital inflows over rate hikes carries growing risks.

Istock.com
Article related image
Author
By Rupa Rege Nitsure

Dr Rupa Rege Nitsure is a former Chief Economist from the BFSI Sector and currently working as an Independent Economist.

June 8, 2026 at 5:26 AM IST

The backdrop to the June 5 monetary policy announcement was far from favourable for the Reserve Bank of India. Heightened uncertainty surrounding the conflict in West Asia and the weak monsoon forecast, persistent capital outflows, significant depreciation of the rupee, and rising inflation expectations among households and businesses had created a difficult policy dilemma between containing inflation and avoiding a slowdown in economic growth.

With capital outflows continuing, and the rupee coming under sustained pressure, the RBI appears to have prioritised attracting foreign capital through a series of targeted measures. So far in 2026, through June 4, foreign investors have withdrawn $27.3 billion from India's debt and equity markets, while the rupee has depreciated 6.1% against the US dollar, following a 5.0% decline in 2025.

Accordingly, on June 5, the RBI announced a series of measures aimed at encouraging dollar inflows. These included concessional foreign exchange swap facilities until September 30, higher investment limits for non-resident Indians and overseas citizens of India, a facility under which the RBI would bear the full hedging cost of banks raising three-to-five-year NRI deposits until September 30, an expansion of the universe of government securities eligible under the Fully Accessible Route, the removal of capital gains tax for foreign investors in government bonds, and a proposal to restore the period for realisation of export proceeds to nine months. Market participants estimate that these measures could attract between $40 billion and $50 billion of capital inflows.

At the same time, the Monetary Policy Committee refrained from providing any clear interest-rate signal, choosing instead to maintain its current policy stance while assessing evolving inflation risks. As Governor Sanjay Malhotra noted in his statement, "Although risks of higher inflation have amplified, the MPC felt it would be prudent to wait for greater clarity to emerge." He added that the Committee would remain data-dependent and closely monitor developments, including the risk of supply-side pressures becoming embedded in the broader price level and inflation expectations.

Inflation Signals
The macroeconomic data released ahead of the MPC meeting help explain the Committee's cautious approach.

  • India's wholesale price inflation accelerated to 8.3% year-on-year in April, from 3.9% in March, the highest level in 42 months. The increase was driven largely by the fuel and power category, where prices rose 24.7%. The ten largest contributors accounted for 63% of wholesale inflation in April and represent critical inputs for sectors ranging from agriculture and logistics to petrochemicals and aviation. Sustained increases in these input costs are likely to feed through to broader prices across the economy. Within one to three months, WPI inflation gets translated to CPI inflation, which is a nominal anchor of monetary policy.
  • The RBI's inflation expectations survey of households, conducted between May 2 and May 11 across 19 major cities, showed a rise in both current inflation perceptions and future inflation expectations. Households' perception of current inflation increased by 60 basis points. Inflation expectations for the next three months rose by 80 basis points, while expectations for the one-year-ahead period increased by 50 basis points.
  • According to the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad's business inflation expectations survey, business inflation expectations rose by 57 basis points to 5.64% in April from 5.07% in March.
  • The price of India's crude oil basket has remained elevated, resulting in significant under-recoveries for oil marketing companies. In response, oil marketing companies raised retail prices of key petroleum products in four rounds during May. Even so, these increases remain insufficient to offset losses arising from elevated crude oil prices, domestic liquefied petroleum gas subsidies and rupee depreciation. According to ICRA, at crude oil prices of $120-$125 per barrel, oil marketing companies are currently losing around ₹700 crore-₹800 crore per day on the sale of petrol, diesel and domestic liquefied petroleum gas, even after accounting for the latest fuel-price increases.
  • Heightened uncertainty surrounding geopolitical developments and the monsoon, particularly the risk of El Niño conditions, together with concerns over rising domestic and imported inflation, have pushed bond yields higher. The weighted average yield on the 10-year government bond has risen by 32 basis points since the conflict in West Asia escalated, moving above 7.0%. Elevated borrowing costs have also affected corporate funding conditions, with corporate bond issuance falling to a three-year low during April-May 2026.

The message conveyed by these data-points is clear and loud.

India is witnessing a significant buildup of price pressures at the wholesale level. However, CPI inflation continues to remain below the target of 4.0% as the passthrough to domestic retail prices has been controlled.

This means it is a case of “repressed CPI inflation”.

Yet, inflation expectations among households have risen significantly, reflecting both increases in non-administered prices within the consumer price index basket and the lingering memory of past inflationary episodes. Business inflation expectations have also increased sharply, as firms are directly confronting higher input costs arising from supply disruptions and rupee depreciation.

Policy Trade-Offs
When policy rates are left unchanged despite rising inflation expectations, real interest rates, measured as nominal interest rates adjusted for expected inflation, tend to decline, particularly within the banking system. Lower real interest rates may support credit growth in the near term, but they also risk unanchoring inflation expectations over time and adding pressure on the currency. They may also discourage financial savings at a time when India's domestic savings rate has already weakened considerably.

As businesses face cost-push pressures arising from supply disruptions and rupee depreciation, a larger share of incremental borrowing may be directed towards working capital requirements rather than fixed investment. In such a scenario, stronger credit growth may not necessarily translate into a commensurate expansion in productive capacity. Lower real interest rates could also encourage faster growth in retail credit segments such as unsecured personal loans, vehicle loans and credit cards, areas that have already attracted regulatory attention because of rapid expansion. To the extent that lower borrowing costs support aggregate demand without a corresponding increase in supply, they may also add to demand-side inflationary pressures.

There may also be an incentive for borrowers to rely more heavily on bank credit than on bond markets, as bond yields have already adjusted upwards in response to rising inflation risks. Rapid credit expansion within the banking system during a period of elevated inflation could eventually weaken asset quality if higher prices erode the debt-servicing capacity of households and businesses.

Delaying policy tightening at this stage may increase the risk of a more disruptive adjustment later. Consumer price inflation currently remains relatively contained, in part because several administered prices have not fully reflected underlying cost pressures. If fiscal constraints eventually limit the government's ability to absorb these costs, the pass-through to consumers could be more pronounced. In such a scenario, inflation could rise sharply, requiring a stronger monetary policy response than would otherwise have been necessary.

Such aggressive tightening usually induces broader economic slowdown with more swings in employment and economic output.