Uttar Pradesh's political theatre is heating up well before the 2027 assembly elections, and the latest flashpoint is a very public falling-out between two men who, not too long ago, shared a stage as allies.
Samajwadi Party (SP) Chief Akhilesh Yadav and Rashtriya Lok Dal (RLD) President Jayant Chaudhary, partners in the 2022 UP elections, are now trading barbs that go well beyond routine political sparring. The spat is not just personal theatre; it cuts to the heart of a battle for western UP's "Jatland," a belt of roughly 76 assembly seats where caste arithmetic could decide the next government.
How the Spat Began
The trigger was a dismissive remark made by SP's UP Unit President Shyamlal Pal about Jayant Chaudhary — a comment that Akhilesh reportedly did not publicly distance himself from. That silence was enough for Chaudhary to read it as a signal of how the SP leadership privately viewed the RLD, even during their years of alliance. Chaudhary struck back hard, though pointedly without naming Akhilesh directly — a common tactic in UP politics that lets a leader land a blow while maintaining plausible deniability.
|
PERFORMANCE OF RLD (SOURCE: ECI)
|
|
YEAR
|
SEATS
|
VOTE SHARE
|
|
2002
|
14
|
2.5%
|
|
2007
|
10
|
3.7%
|
|
2012
|
9
|
2.3%
|
|
2017
|
1
|
1.8%
|
|
2022
|
8
|
2.9%
|
His sharpest jab was reserved for the SP's signature electoral formula: PDA, short for Pichda (backward classes), Dalit, and Alpsankhyak (minority). Akhilesh has built much of his post-2022 political identity around this coalition-building idea, positioning it as a rainbow alliance capable of taking on the BJP. Chaudhary turned the acronym on its head, mocking it as "peeda" — a Hindi word meaning pain or affliction — suggesting that far from being a unifying formula, it represents frustration and unmet promises for those it claims to represent.
Chaudhary went further, accusing senior SP leaders of harbouring quiet contempt for the RLD throughout their years of partnership, despite the outward appearance of camaraderie. He argued that any alliance has to be built on mutual respect and genuine dialogue between parties and their grassroots workers, implying that this had been missing in the SP-RLD partnership. He also cautioned against turning politics into what he called an "arena of caste," a charge that carries some irony given how central the caste calculus is to both parties' electoral strategies.
Akhilesh, for his part, has not backed down. He invoked the legacy of former Prime Minister Chaudhary Charan Singh — Jayant Chaudhary's own grandfather and a towering figure among UP's Jat and farming communities — while training his fire on the BJP instead. By reclaiming Charan Singh's legacy as part of his own political messaging, Akhilesh appears to be making a direct play for Jat voters, effectively challenging Chaudhary on his own turf and suggesting that respect for the farmer-icon's ideals matters more than which party currently claims his descendant.
A History of Whiplash
This isn't the first time the SP-RLD relationship has swung between alliance and animosity. The two parties fought the 2022 UP assembly elections together, riding a wave of farmer anger following the Centre's since-repealed farm laws. That partnership yielded results, though not as expected, particularly in western UP, but it didn't survive long. Just ahead of the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, Jayant Chaudhary broke away from the INDIA bloc altogether and aligned the RLD with the BJP-led NDA — a move that stunned many of his own supporters, given the RLD's traditional positioning as a farmer-first, secular party.
That history adds an extra layer of bitterness to the current exchange. For SP loyalists, Chaudhary's criticism of the PDA formula smacks of opportunism from someone who abandoned the opposition camp for power. For RLD supporters, the SP's alleged condescension validates Chaudhary's decision to walk away in 2024.
Why Jatland Matters
The stakes in this rivalry go well beyond hurt feelings. The battleground is what political analysts call UP's "Jatland" — a cluster of around 76 assembly seats concentrated in western UP, spanning districts like Bulansahar, Agra, Aligarh, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Meerut, Muzaffarnagar, Shamli, Bijnor, Baghpat, Saharanpur, and Ghaziabad. While Jats make up only about 2% of UP's overall population, their concentration is far higher in this belt — historical census data from 1931 suggests figures as high as 26% in some districts, and modern estimates put the western UP share at 17-18%.
Crucially, many of these same seats also have a Muslim population well above the state average — around 25% on average across the 76 seats, compared to Dalits at 19% and Jats at 17%. When Jat and Muslim votes combine, as they have in select alliances historically, their joint strength can exceed 40% to 50% in several districts. That combination is precisely what the SP is hoping to engineer with its Dalit-Muslim-backward classes coalition strategy in the absence of RLD as an ally.
Historically, Jats voted loyally for the RLD or whichever party it partnered with — the BJP in 2002 (14 seats), independently in 2007 (10 seats), and with Congress in 2012 (9 seats). But the 2013 Muzaffarnagar riots fundamentally altered this pattern, pushing Jats toward the BJP's Hindutva and nationalist messaging. Survey data shows Jat support for the BJP surged to 77% in 2014, dipped to 38% in the more localised 2017 state elections, and climbed back to 54% by 2022.
|
VOTING PATTERN OF JATS IN UTTAR PRADESH (SOURCE: CSDS)
|
|
BJP
|
SP
|
|
2017
|
2022
|
2017
|
2022
|
|
38%
|
54%
|
57%
|
33%
|
|
BSP
|
INC
|
|
2017
|
2022
|
2017
|
2022
|
|
3%
|
12%
|
1%
|
0%
|
The 2020 farm laws briefly threatened that loyalty. Farmer leader Rakesh Tikait's protests put Jat anger toward the BJP on full display, forcing the Centre to repeal the legislation ahead of the 2022 polls. Yet, even with the law rolled back, many in the Jat community feel their grievances went unaddressed and their political weight underappreciated — despite UP's 60-member cabinet including four Jat ministers, a proportion well above their population share.
The Numbers Game
Electoral math in this belt has shifted dramatically over the past decade. In 2012, the BSP dominated with 30 of the 76 seats, followed by the SP (18), the Congress-RLD alliance (14), and the BJP (13). By 2017, the BJP had swept 65 of these seats outright, reducing the SP, BSP, and Congress to single digits combined. In 2022, BJP could win just 41 (-24) while SP-RLD alliance 35.
|
PERFORMANCE OF PARTIES IN JAT INFLUENCED SEATS
|
|
2012
|
2017
|
2022
|
|
BJP
|
13
|
65
|
41
|
|
INC
|
6
|
2
|
0
|
|
BSP
|
30
|
3
|
0
|
|
SP
|
18
|
5
|
27
|
|
RLD
|
8
|
1
|
8
|
|
OTH
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Looking ahead to 2027, much may hinge on how far Mayawati's BSP has weakened and whether the SP can absorb that vote share of Dalits alongside residual Jat resentment toward the BJP. RLD benefitted from Muslim support due to alliance with SP in 2022 which it hopes to compensate through the general category and non-Yadav OBC voters of BJP.