Financing and Proving the Platform-Based Grid Model

The Implementation: The new architecture’s power lies in breaking the monolithic grid into distinct asset classes, each with its own risk-return profile.

Article related image
iStock.com
By Sharmila Chavaly

Sharmila Chavaly, ex-senior civil servant, specialises in infra, project finance, and PPPs. She held key roles in railways and finance ministries.

October 28, 2025 at 6:46 AM IST

1. Introduction: The Financial Imperative
The blueprint for the Platform-Based Grid provides the architectural “how.” But its execution hinges on a financial revolution. The conventional model, reliant on sovereign debt and volumetric tariffs, is broken. Pouring more public capital into it is akin to refuelling a sinking ship. The solution is a shift from subsidising monolithic utilities to leveraging disaggregated, de-risked private capital for discrete, investable assets. The Platform-Based Grid makes this possible, and the cost of inaction is no longer theoretical—it arrives in the form of multi-billion-dollar bills that cripple competitiveness.

2. The Disaggregated Financial Model
The new architecture’s power lies in breaking the monolithic grid into distinct asset classes, each with its own risk-return profile.

Bottom of Form

2.1 Funding the Capillaries (The Distributed Layer)

  • Goal: Catalyse private investment to drive rapid, bottom-up electrification.
  • Mechanism: Blended Finance. Use public funds to de-risk the sector for private players via:
    • First-Loss Capital: A public entity absorbs initial losses to attract commercial debt.
    • Credit Enhancement: Guarantees to help developers access loans.
    • Results-Based Financing: Payments tied to verified outcomes.
  • Proof Point: The global success of Pay-As-You-Go (PAYGO) solar companies, which have turned millions of low-income households into bankable customers, attracting billions in private capital.

2.2 Funding the Arteries (The Transport Layer)

  • Goal: Secure massive, long-term capital without overburdening the public purse.
  • Mechanism: Regulated Asset-Based Finance. Frame transmission as a revenue-generating utility.
    • The “Wheeling Charge” Model: Investors fund construction and earn a return through transparent fees for moving power, creating a predictable asset class.
  • Policy Enabler: India’s proposed “GST-like model” for power, which would create a “National Network Tariff,” directly adopts this principle, ring-fencing revenue for grid infrastructure.

2.3 The “Virtual Grid” Accelerator

  • Tactic: Use grid-scale Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) as “non-wires alternatives.”
  • How it Works: BESS acts as “virtual transmission,” injecting power during peaks and absorbing excess energy, unlocking latent capacity on existing lines.
  • Speed & Cost Advantage: BESS can be deployed in 1-2 years versus 5-10+ years for new transmission, representing a tripling of speed and massive savings.
  • Global Proof Point: Chile specifically auctions BESS contracts for congestion relief, and U.S. utilities from California to New York are rapidly adopting this approach.

3. The Financial Comparator

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

4. Case Study: Sub-Saharan Africa – The Leapfrog Strategy
The slow progress on electricity access in Sub-Saharan Africa is a direct consequence of using a 20th-century playbook. The Platform-Based Grid enables a leapfrog strategy.

  • Parallel, Not Sequential, Development: Develop microgrids (capillaries) and strategic transmission corridors (arteries) in parallel.
  • The Grid as a Backbone, Not a Monopoly: As arteries are built, microgrids connect to them. The national grid transforms from a sole supplier into a wholesaler of last resort and a reliability backbone.
  • Financial Logic: This turns the challenge of universal access into a series of bankable projects, accelerating progress and avoiding the fiscal traps of the past.

5. The choice for policymakers
When evaluated on a cost, time, and equity basis, the case for the Platform-Based Grid is strong.

  • Cost: It disperses risk, unlocks private capital, and optimises system costs, unlike the old model that imposes massive recurring bills on consumers.
  • Time: It delivers results in years, not decades, through parallel development and “virtual grid” technologies.
  • Equity: It targets the underserved first and funds infrastructure through a more equitable “Grid Assurance Fee,” breaking the death spiral.

The forecast of a distributed energy future can be seen then as not a threat, but an outcome to be architected, with the platform-based grid as a blueprint. The issue for policymakers moves from how to replace the old grid to whether they will be remembered for managing the old grid’s costly collapse (what’s called paying its “stupidity taxes”), or for spearheading its strategic repurposing through a comprehensive, financially-viable plan.

“The Implementation:” is last in a three-part series. Part 1, “The Diagnosis” discussed why one-way grid built for the industrial age can no longer power the digital one, and Part 2, “The Prescription”, set out a vision for a new “Arterial Grid.”