.png)

Chandrika Soyantar is an investment banker and founder Director at Amarisa Capital Advisor.
January 23, 2026 at 9:06 AM IST
For much of the last two decades, the Baltic Freight Index was interpreted primarily as a cyclical indicator associated with global growth and industrial demand. That interpretation no longer captures what the index conveys today. In its current role, the Baltic Dry Index reflects how efficiently or inefficiently the global supply system is able to move essential cargo through sea routes shaped by fragmentation, rerouting and the growing importance of maritime choke points.
The evolution of the index mirrors this shift. The original Baltic Freight Index was introduced in 1985 as a broad benchmark for freight market settlement and financial referencing. Its replacement in 1999 by the Baltic Dry Index narrowed the focus to dry bulk shipping and anchored the signal more firmly in observed physical vessel employment. This transition reduced financial abstraction and strengthened the connection between the index and real trade conditions.
Trade Architecture
The global economy remains deeply dependent on the movement of dry bulk cargo. Iron ore, coal, grains and fertilisers form the foundation of infrastructure, power generation, food security and agricultural output. These cargo movements are non-discretionary and persist regardless of financial sentiment or business cycles. What has changed fundamentally is not their importance, but the conditions under which these cargoes move.
Shipping routes that were once treated as public global utilities, similar to international airspace, early commercial undersea cables, and major sea lanes in peacetime They are now increasingly shaped by geopolitics, regulation, sanctions, insurance constraints and security considerations concentrated around a small number of critical maritime choke points.
Port infrastructure, long governed by commercial logic, is now increasingly viewed through sovereign lens. Changes in ownership involving global private capital and foreign strategic interests are increasingly influenced by state considerations, affecting the pace and certainty of transactions. Ports are thus being reclassified from neutral trade facilitators to strategic sovereign assets.
The current reclassification of ports and sea lanes as strategic assets echoes an earlier era when trade infrastructure was inseparable from state power, even if the mechanisms of control are now regulatory and financial rather than territorial.
As a result, freight markets increasingly respond not only to shift in demand alone but also increasingly to constraints on access, routing, movement and utilisation. This explains why index volatility has risen even when aggregate trade volumes appear stable.
Viewed in this context, distance has reemerged as a meaningful economic variable. The assumption that globalisation permanently compressed geography has weakened. Route avoidance, congestion and rerouting around vulnerable choke points have increased the voyage length and the share of time ships spend repositioning or sailing without cargo, through ballast legs, even when cargo volumes remain unchanged. Tonne mile demand is therefore being sustained not by higher volumes, but by less efficient movement. The BDI captures this reality earlier than most macro indicators because it reflects physical utilisation rather than expectations or surveys.
Index Mechanics
Information is transmitted through two channels. One, the level of the index reflects the prevailing balance between vessel supply and cargo demand. Two, volatility reflects uncertainty in routes, access, insurance, and operational conditions. In periods of stress or transition, volatility often rises before sustained changes in levels, signalling adjustment even when aggregate trade volumes appear stable.
Different Regimes
The index design and its transmission mechanism explain why the index has been informative across very different regimes. Its prominence during the pre-2008 commodity expansion reflected demand pressure in an increasingly integrated global economy. Before 2008, it responded primarily to demand expansion and contraction in an increasingly integrated global economy. Its subsequent collapse captured the abrupt seizure of trade finance and shipping demand as the financial system fractured. In the years that followed, improving trade conditions would ordinarily have lifted freight rates, but excess ship supply kept rates suppressed, leaving index levels low despite changing underlying conditions.
During the COVID period, it reflected supply chain disruption, port congestion, container and bulk dislocation, and the breakdown of logistical synchronisation rather than a simple collapse or surge in demand. Across these episodes, the index registered balance conditions, while volatility carried the more important signal of system physical stress and reconfiguration even before these appeared in conventional macroeconomic or financial indicators.
Recent research on maritime risk has further highlighted how a relatively small set of sea lanes and choke points account for a disproportionate share of global trade exposure. Disruptions at these locations propagate through the shipping system by forcing large scale rerouting, tying up vessel capacity, and amplifying freight volatility well beyond the value of the cargo directly affected. Such dynamics align closely with the behaviour captured by the BDI during periods of stress.
Real Indicator
In this sense, the Baltic Dry Index can be understood as an early forerunner of the class of real time physical indicators that are now gaining prominence. Satellite imagery of night time lights, tracking of maritime movements, and aggregated location data such as parked vehicle counts around stores are increasingly used to infer economic conditions without relying on surveys or reported statistics. The Baltic Dry Index anticipated this shift by measuring physical utilisation directly, long before such data became widespread
India’s Strategy
The change in global system is particularly relevant for India given its geographic position and exposure to seaborne trade. With a long coastline spanning the Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal, India sits astride the main east west sea lanes of the Indian Ocean that have supported trade for centuries and remain central in a fragmented global supply system.
India remains structurally material intensive. As a large importer of coal, fertilisers and edible oils, and a growing exporter of steel and agricultural commodities, seaborne trade is central to its growth, inflation dynamics and external balance. Changes in freight conditions therefore transmit directly into the domestic economy.
India’s policy response reflects an awareness of these constraints. Port development and modernisation are being paired with dedicated rail freight corridors linking industrial and agricultural hubs to the coastline, alongside road network upgrades that reduce inland logistics friction. This approach recognises that economic resilience depends on the reliable movement of physical goods rather than on cost optimisation alone. India has also become increasingly conscious of route concentration risk, prompting efforts to diversify maritime access and reduce dependence on individual choke points.
In a fragmented global supply system, fragmentation does not reduce shipping demand. Instead, it complicates the movement of goods by lengthening routes, multiplying movements, and increasing reliance on flexible vessel deployment. The BDI aggregates these micro level physical decisions into a macro level signal and therefore offers insight into the functioning of global trade beyond simple measures of expansion or contraction.
Viewed in this context, movements in the index reflect how the global supply system is absorbing fragmentation, rerouting, and choke point risk before these pressures surface in prices, margins, or policy responses. For economies with high exposure to maritime flows such as India, the Baltic Dry Index makes emerging stress points in global trade conditions visible ahead of conventional economic indicators.