Trade Credit: India’s Financial Stability Blind Spot and Hidden Contagion Risk

The trade credit network is trust-based, and economic or geopolitical uncertainties disrupt its delicate balance. What India needs is to formalise this framework to ensure safeguarding manufacturing growth and financial stability.

Article related image
Author
By BL Chandak

BL Chandak, former DGM at SIDBI, has worked for over three decades in research, project appraisal, credit sanctioning, policy liaison, and branch management. 

June 25, 2026 at 6:02 AM IST

India's financial policy architecture closely monitors banks, capital markets, digital payments, fiscal deficits, interest rates and NPAs. Yet, the actual operational bloodstream of trade and industry—the trade credit network—largely remains a dark continent.

Trade credit finances a substantial share of working capital across MSMEs, traders, manufacturers and supply chains.

Today, several seemingly disconnected developments warrant attention:

  • Persistent payment delays/defaults and growing receivables uncertainty.
  • Declining trade credit velocity.
  • Weakening trust and confidence in counterparties.
  • Rising liquidity hoarding.
  • Large increase in currency in circulation despite comfortable system liquidity, indicating cash hoarding and slowing transactional liquidity in supply chains.

Payment Discipline and Behavioural Change
The geopolitical disturbances in West Asia, rising crude oil prices, higher freight and insurance costs, and disruptions to global shipping routes have added to the stress of an already destabilised trade credit ecosystem. More importantly, these shocks have accelerated the erosion of confidence and trust that sustains trade credit flows.

As uncertainty rose, businesses questioned the reliability of counterparties, conserved liquidity, postponed payments, and reduced credit exposure.

This, in turn, reduced trust-based credit flows, weakened trade credit volume and velocity, and increased the risk of contagion, whereby payment delays, liquidity shortages, and risk aversion propagate through interconnected supply chains.

What begins as an isolated payment stress can quickly trigger a loss of confidence among businesses, setting off a broader contraction in trade credit, transactional liquidity, and economic activity. The issue is not merely higher costs. The more important development is the behavioural response.

Businesses facing uncertainty over costs, delivery schedules and future cash flows increasingly become defensive with liquidity being conserved, payment decisions postponed, suppliers becoming more selective, credit periods shortening and confidence in receivables weakened.

Lessons from History
Major financial upheavals—pandemics, wars, and systemic shocks—often alter repayment behaviour, credit risk perception, business confidence, and liquidity conditions. The resulting erosion of trust and changes in payment behaviour can persist long after the original shock has passed.

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke identified the breakdown of the credit system as one of the defining features of the Great Depression. The inability of the credit architecture to create and circulate sufficient credit impaired monetary policy transmission and prolonged the Depression.

Historians increasingly recognise that erosion in  trade credit flows became one of the principal channels through which financial distress was transmitted to the real economy.

As firms delayed payments, withdrew supplier credit and shifted from trust-based commerce to cash survival, liquidity stress spread rapidly. And because trade credit functions as the lifeline for most businesses, especially MSMEs, this triggered financial sickness, production cuts, unemployment and deeper economic contraction.

What followed was familiar - confidence weakened, liquidity was hoarded, trade credit circulation slowed, inter-firm deleveraging accelerated, transactional liquidity contracted and economic activity weakened.

The Behavioural Contagion
Traders, MSMEs, bankers, chartered accountants and industry associations all said payment behaviour has changed since the COVID-19 pandemic.

When firms saw that payment delays carried little penalty, defaults were tolerated, and even reputed companies routinely stretched payments, a herd mentality took hold. Payment discipline eroded not out of necessity, but because delayed payment became an accepted and consequence-free business practice.

The trade credit system, thus, gradually shifts to a low-trust equilibrium that does not self-correct.

Receivables become less reliable as financial assets, suppliers become reluctant lenders, and businesses increasingly prioritise liquidity preservation over credit extension. As a result, the same rupee of trade credit circulates fewer times, effectively reducing the velocity of money within the ecosystem.

The Lehman Analogy
The mechanism bears an uncomfortable resemblance to the dynamics preceding major financial crises. Unlike a bank loan default, a trade credit default is multilateral and inherently contagious, with payment delays and defaults cascading through interconnected supply chains and transmitting liquidity stress across the economy. As confidence weakens and hidden exposures build up, liquidity can freeze even when banks and large corporates appear financially sound. A trade-credit-led liquidity seizure can mirror past episodes when a loss of confidence disrupted the normal flow of credit and liquidity.

Given the largely invisible nature of inter-firm credit networks, the warning signs may be overlooked until stress begins to propagate across supply chains. If such dynamics become widespread, they could create significant liquidity pressures for businesses—particularly MSMEs—and amplify broader economic vulnerabilities.

The Missing Variable
Economists missed important aspects of the 2008 financial crisis because they underestimated micro-level borrower behaviour. Today, the risk may be in ignoring micro-level B2B  payment behaviour of buyers.

We observe:

  • GST collections
  • Bank credit growth
  • Digital payments
  • NPAs

But we do not observe:

  • Invoice-level payment behaviour
  • Trade credit velocity
  • Receivable ageing
  • Counterparty payment performance
  • Confidence within trade credit chains

Persistent economic paradoxes often emerge because a critical variable remains unmeasured. Trade credit is one such critical missing variable.

Why This Matters 
India’s trade credit ecosystem has been experiencing a gradual erosion of liquidity and confidence. Recent geopolitical developments have transformed this slow-moving deterioration into a more pronounced source of stress, amplifying payment delays, counterparty uncertainty, liquidity hoarding, and the decline in trade credit volume and velocity. These developments are increasing the risk of liquidity stress spreading through the trade credit ecosystem via contagion effects. The June 2026 GST collections, reflecting May 2026 business activity, may provide an early indication of the extent to which these pressures are beginning to affect economic transactions and tax realisation.

Policy Opportunity
India already possesses much of the digital  infrastructure required to address this blind spot.

GSTN captures invoice-level transactions.

The digital payment infrastructure captures payment-level settlements.

The Account Aggregator framework provides a consent-based data architecture.

The missing link is invoice-payment pairing.

When payment behaviour becomes visible, it becomes disciplinable.

Linking GST invoices with digital payment records can create:

  • Verified cash-flow trails.
  • Counterparty payment behaviour analytics.
  • Trade credit velocity indicators.
  • Early-warning systems.
  • Dynamic working-capital assessment.
  • B2B payment credit scores.

The central challenge may no longer be the availability of money, but preserving B2B credit-based transactional confidence and maintaining the flow of liquidity and credit within supply chains. Rising payment delays, weakening confidence in timely payment realisation, and slowing trade credit circulation are increasingly impairing commercial transactions. Recent geopolitical developments—through higher energy costs, supply-chain disruptions, and heightened uncertainty—are amplifying these stresses and increasing the risk of liquidity pressures spreading across the commercial ecosystem.

If left unchecked, trade credit could become a key transmission channel through which localised stress propagates to supply chains, the financial system, and the broader economy.

Strong macro indicators should not obscure growing liquidity stress within India’s trade ecosystem. Waiting for market self-correction may prove risky. Bringing trade credit into the analytical framework and enforcing payment discipline through GSTN invoice-payment pairing are now critical to protecting manufacturing growth, financial stability, and the Viksit Bharat vision.